Is Linear Independence Preserved Under Subsets?

AlexChandler
Messages
281
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let V be a vector space and \{v_1,...,v_{n+1} \} \subset V a set of linearly independent
vectors of V . Show directly: (Don't just quote a theorem!)

(a) The set \{v_1,...,v_{n} \} is linearly independent.

(b) v_{n+1} \not \in span \{v_1,...,v_{n} \}

Homework Equations



r_1_v_1_ + ... + r_{n+1}v_{n+1} = 0 \Rightarrow r_1=...=r_{n+1} = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I have a feeling that I am doing something horribly wrong by saying this. But...

(a) We are given that

r_1_v_1_ + ... + r_{n+1}v_{n+1} = 0 \Rightarrow r_1=...=r_{n+1} = 0

since we know that r_{n+1} = 0

we must have

r_1_v_1_ + ...+ r_n v_n + 0 v_{n+1} = 0 \Rightarrow r_1=...=r_n =r_{n+1} = 0

then

r_1_v_1_ + ...+ r_n v_n = 0 \Rightarrow r_1=...=r_n = 0

(b) suppose v_{n+1} is an element of span\{v_1,...,v_{n} \}

then

v_{n+1} = r_1_v_1_ + ...+ r_n v_n

then we have

r_1_v_1_ + ...+ r_n v_n - v_{n+1} =0

since we know that \{v_1,...,v_{n+1} \} is linearly independent, this last equation must be impossible. Thus our initial assumption must be incorrect, and we must have:

v_{n+1} \not \in span \{v_1,...,v_{n} \}

I feel a bit more confident on part b, but not completely. We have not really focused much on proofs this semester in Linear Algebra, but I have a feeling they will be emphasized on the final. Any comments would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
both of them look good to me
a) definition of linear independence, shows a subset of a linearly independent set mut aslo be linearly independent
b) definition of linear independence shows no vector in a linearly independent set can be re-written as a linear combination of others vectors in the set
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top