Is M a Vector Space Over Real Numbers?

iloveannaw
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



show whether the following set of vectors M = \left\{\left(a_{1},a_{2},a_{3}\right) with a_{1},a_{2},a_{3} \in \Re\right\}

with the following limitations:
1) a1 is rational
2) a1 = 0
3) a1 + a2 = 0
4) a1 + a2 = 1

is a vector space over the field of real numbers.

Homework Equations


various axioms
* x+y = y+x.
* (x+y)+z = x+(y+z).
* 0+x = x+0 = x.
* (-x) + x = x + (-x) = 0.

For every x in X and real numbers c,d, we have

* 0x = 0
* 1x = x
* (cd)x = c(dx)

* c(x+y) = cx + cy.
* (c+d)x = cx +dx.

The Attempt at a Solution



I just don't get it, I really wish I could. I understand the axioms but when I apply them i find that M is a vector space regardless of the limitations.

somebody please help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll need to check a few things, first of all you'll need closure of the operations.
What do I mean with that?

Take (a_1,a_2,a_3) and (b_1,b_2,b_3) in M. Does (a_1+b_1,a_2+b_2,a_3+b_3) lie in M. In other words, does this triple satisfy the three limitations. This means that the addition is closed in M.

Take (a_1,a_2,a_3) in M and \alpha\in \mathbb{R}. Does (\alpha a_1,\alpha a_2, \alpha a_3) lie in M. In other words, does this triple satisfy the three limitations. This means that scalar products are closed in M.

I conjecture that neither addition nor multiplication is closed in M (thus we are not dealing with a vector space). Can you give me examples why not?
 
how could you tell if
(a_1+b_1,a_2+b_2,a_3+b_3) was in M or not, in fact what is in M? I know at least vector (a_1,a_2,a_3)

and there are four limitations now - i just edited my op

thanks
 
I actually realized that you had 4 problems.

Let me solve problem 1 fo you:
So let M be the collection of triples (a_1,a_2,a_3) such that a_1 is rational.

First we check closure under addition. Take two triples (a_1,a_2,a_3) and (b_1,b_2,b_3) in M. This means that a_1 and a_2 are rational. We need to check that (a_1,a_2,a_3)+(b_1,b_2,b_3)=(a_1+b_1,a_2+b_2,a_3+b_3) is in M. For this, we just need to check that a_1+b_1 is rational. But since a_1 and a_2 are rational, so is their sum.
So closure under addition is checked.

Now, closure under multplication. Take a triple (a_1,a_2,a_3) in M (this means that a_1 is rational) and \alpha\in \mathbb{R}. We need to check that (\alpha a_1,\alpha a_2,\alpha a_3) is in M. For this, we just need to check that \alpha a_1 is rational. But this is not always the case. For example, (a_1,a_2,a_3) could be (1,0,0) (this is indeed a vector in M) and \alpha could be \pi, then (\alpha a_1,\alpha a_2,\alpha a_3)=(\pi, 0,0). This is not in M, since \pi is not rational.
So we do not have closure under multiplication, so we do not have a vector space.

Can you check the other examples? this is quite analogous.
 
thanks, that seems so much clearer. I knew that the result of the operation had to remain in M but I had no idea what that meant.
hmm, if I've understood it 2) a1 = 0 and 3) a1 + a2 = 0 are vector spaces over R and
4) a1 + a2 = 1 isn't because

a_{1} = 1 - a_{2} and b_{1} = 1 - b_{2}

(a_{1} + b_{1}, a_{2} + b_{2}, a_{3} + b_{3}) = (1 - a_{2} + 1 - b_{2}, a_{2} + b_{2}, a_{3} + b_{3})

and

1 - a_{2} + 1 - b_{2} + a_{2} + b_{2} = 2 != 1
 
Yes! I've think you've got it.

But note, for 2 and 3, you've just checked that the space is closed under the operations. You'll need to check the other axioms of a vector space to (associativity, neutral element,...). But this shouldn't be to much of a problem...

For 1 and 4, you've seen that they are not closed under the operations, so they cannot be vector spaces...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top