Is Max Born Ignoring the Electric Field that Produces Current in his Theory?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter GregAshmore
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Max Reading
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Max Born's "Einstein's Theory of Relativity" presents a nuanced discussion on the relationship between electric fields and currents in wires. On page 297, Born states that a wire carrying current is electrically neutral and surrounded solely by a magnetic field. However, on page 161, he asserts that the current is generated by an electric field. The discussion clarifies that Born is not ignoring the electric field that produces the current; rather, he is emphasizing the electric field generated by the charge as perceived by an observer in relative motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory
  • Familiarity with Max Born's "Einstein's Theory of Relativity"
  • Knowledge of electric and magnetic fields
  • Concept of relative motion in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of electromagnetic theory in detail
  • Review the specific sections of Max Born's "Einstein's Theory of Relativity" for deeper insights
  • Explore the relationship between electric fields and magnetic fields in current-carrying conductors
  • Investigate the effects of relative motion on electric and magnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching electromagnetic theory, and researchers exploring the implications of electric and magnetic fields in relativity.

GregAshmore
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
I'm reading Max Born's "Einstein's Theory of Relativity", 1962 version. On page 297 he says that a wire with a current in it is electrically neutral and surrounded by only a magnetic field.

Yet on page 161 he says that current in a wire is the result of an electric field.

It would seem that the wire on page 297, with its electric current, must be in an electric field.

What am I missing?

The context on page 297 is the electrical charge which is seen by an observer moving relative to the wire. That charge produces an electric field around the wire. Is he ignoring, for the sake of discussion, the electric field which produces the current in order to focus on the electric field produced by the charge in the wire?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GregAshmore said:
Is he ignoring, for the sake of discussion, the electric field which produces the current in order to focus on the electric field produced by the charge in the wire?
Exactly.
 
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
92
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K