jonegil
has anyone ever memorized the periodic table?
My old physics professor has it memorized.jonegil said:has anyone ever memorized the periodic table?
ice109 said:i think if you have it memorized it's easier to see the trends
Moonbear said:We had to memorize it when I was in junior high school. But, there were a lot less elements on it back then.![]()
cyrusabdollahi said:The table is already structured to show trends in orbitals and chemical properties.
It is not necessary since one can readily find it on-line or perhaps print one and put it on the wall. But with time, one can learn the groups, e.g. alkali, alkali earth, halides and noble gases.jonegil said:has anyone ever memorized the periodic table?
Spoken like a true engineer.cyrusabdollahi said:What would be the point in memorizing such useless information? Thats the whole reason why its ordered in a table for you to look up.
cronxeh said:Dinosaur days?
zzzzing
hey are you going to reply to my pm?![]()
The second from the last column (group 17) is referred to as the ‘Halogens’.jonegil said:i had never seen that group..halides...it certainly corresponds to the "halogéneos" group in portuguese..(F,CL,Br,I and At) i guess.
that's what i thought; if a physicist/chemist used a periodic table on a daily basis it wouldn't take long to memorize it, but the person probably wouldn't think of it as memorization. memorizing it just for fun sounds like a waste of time though.mrjeffy321 said:Useless, I think not. I use the information on the periodic table everyday and it is not even my field of study.
I do think that there is some value in having portions of the periodic table memorized, just as one memorizes the multiplication tables, but I would not go so far as to advocate memorizing the entire table so that you could recreate it from scratch on a blank piece of paper.
chemestry... or chemystry... or alchymyjonegil said:oh...sorry about the previous blunder...i'm not used to "english chemestry"
shramana said:India. We memorize a lot of useless stuff like log values etc. as well.
ice109 said:you guys don't have calculators that evaluates log?
chaoseverlasting said:We arent allowed to use calculators. Not in high school, not for any tests, not in class, for anything really. I think college is going to be the same to some extent. Vedic/mental mathematics is encouraged (and required actually if you want to pass).
We usually memorize the S/P/D/F block elements with their positions and atomic weights. Radioactive disintegration series. As far as log is concerned, log 2, 3, 5, 7 are memorized, and the "times tables" till twenty.
moose said:ice109, 2, 3, 5, and 7 are chosen because they are the first prime numbers.
chaoseverlasting said:Yeah. You can really simplify calculations and do them a lot faster if you know those log values. It really does make sense.
If you want to have to do anything related to chemistry, it's extremely helpful to have a good picture of the PT stored in memory. Every time you come across some relationship between properties of two compounds, the likelihood of it setting off a lightbulb in your head is directly proportional to whether or not you've got the PT memorized. If you haven't memorized the PT, you will miss out on figuring out so many of the reasons why things are the way they are. And without the help of this explanatory logic, you have to take up additional memory space just to remember these facts without basis.cyrusabdollahi said:What would be the point in memorizing such useless information? Thats the whole reason why its ordered in a table for you to look up.
shramana said:We are supposed to memorize the entire periodic table because we don't get the table during exams in high school.
Gokul43201 said:If you want to have to do anything related to chemistry, it's extremely helpful to have a good picture of the PT stored in memory. Every time you come across some relationship between properties of two compounds, the likelihood of it setting off a lightbulb in your head is directly proportional to whether or not you've got the PT memorized. If you haven't memorized the PT, you will miss out on figuring out so many of the reasons why things are the way they are. And without the help of this explanatory logic, you have to take up additional memory space just to remember these facts without basis.
I memorize the PT because that way, I have to remember fewer things in chemistry.
Gokul43201 said:If you want to have to do anything related to chemistry, it's extremely helpful to have a good picture of the PT stored in memory. Every time you come across some relationship between properties of two compounds, the likelihood of it setting off a lightbulb in your head is directly proportional to whether or not you've got the PT memorized. If you haven't memorized the PT, you will miss out on figuring out so many of the reasons why things are the way they are. And without the help of this explanatory logic, you have to take up additional memory space just to remember these facts without basis.
I memorize the PT because that way, I have to remember fewer things in chemistry.
Memorizing atomic numbers and symbols is useful, believe me, as is memorizing a few of the atomic weights of elements.cyrusabdollahi said:How does memorizing atomic weights, or atomic number, or atomic symbol help? How does that explain why things are the way they are? I would think spdf orbitals are the only things of real value, and those are already in order by the way the table is ordered. So you can look at the table and find the orbital instantly since you know how its arranged.
mrjeffy321 said:Memorizing atomic numbers and symbols is useful, believe me, as is memorizing a few of the atomic weights of elements.
If one is doing calculations and has constantly refer back to the periodic table for every single bit of information then one is slowed down considerably.
It is much quicker to have the atomic number of Oxygen memorized (8) and know that its molar mass is 16.00 g/mol. There are several elements which are so common that you will naturally memorize their information; you don’t need to do this for all elements however...for example the molar mass of Bohrium (264 g/mol) doesn’t come up that often in my experience.
cyrusabdollahi said:I HATE having to memorize ANYTHING. If its important to remember, you will remember it from using it from experience. (Which is exactly what you are describing). What the OP is describing, is memorizing the PT to take an exam, and that is worthless information (even though its the same information, because it has no purpose other than to take an exam).
That's why there is the saying "Either you use it or you lose it."