Is my book making an algebra error?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding a system of equations presented in a book, specifically whether there is an algebraic error or a notation issue. The equations involve variables τ, Φ, and c, and the user struggles to manipulate them into the form shown in the book. They attempted substitutions and long division but arrived at a different result. A suggestion is made that the book may be making an approximation, assuming that the ratio of Φ to c² is much smaller than one. This insight helps clarify the potential discrepancy in the user's calculations.
ozone
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
Not sure if this is a notation error or an algebra or if I am wrong , but my book presents a system of equations and I cannot get it into the form which it is presented

\tau _b = \left(1 + \frac{\Phi _b}{c^2}\right)\text{ }\text{$\Delta $t}

\tau _a = \left(1 + \frac{\Phi _a}{c^2}\right)\text{ }\text{$\Delta $t}

\tau _b = \left(1 + \frac{\Phi _{b-}\Phi _a}{c^2}\right)\text{ }\tau _a

Just wondering if I am missing something obvious here or if they are performing black magic. I tried subbing in for delta t and then doing long division but my answer was slightly different from their form.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ozone said:
Not sure if this is a notation error or an algebra or if I am wrong , but my book presents a system of equations and I cannot get it into the form which it is presented

\tau _b = \left(1 + \frac{\Phi _b}{c^2}\right)\text{ }\text{$\Delta $t}

\tau _a = \left(1 + \frac{\Phi _a}{c^2}\right)\text{ }\text{$\Delta $t}

\tau _b = \left(1 + \frac{\Phi _{b-}\Phi _a}{c^2}\right)\text{ }\tau _a

Just wondering if I am missing something obvious here or if they are performing black magic. I tried subbing in for delta t and then doing long division but my answer was slightly different from their form.

Could it be that they are making an approximation under the assumption that ##\frac{\Phi_a}{c^2}## is much smaller than 1?
 
Ahh I suppose that you are probably right.. thank you.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top