Is My Equation for Finding Electric Potential in the Correct Form?

AI Thread Summary
The equation for electric potential presented, V = (sigma)/(2*epsilon_0)*((z^2 + R^2)^(1/2) - z), is incorrect due to the inclusion of the "-z" term. Instead, it should incorporate another term involving the inner radius (r) of the disk, specifically replacing "-z" with sqrt(z^2 + r^2). The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up the integral for potential, suggesting the use of dQ = sigma*dx and clarifying the limits of integration from r to R. Participants recommend renaming variables to avoid confusion among the different radii involved in the problem. Properly adjusting the equation and understanding the integration setup will lead to the correct solution.
VitaX
Messages
183
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



mwqgxt.jpg


Homework Equations



V = (sigma)/(2*epsilon_0)*((z^2 + R^2)^(1/2) - z)

The Attempt at a Solution



This was my full equation to find the total electric potential:

V = (sigma)/(2*epsilon_0)*((z^2 + R^2)^(1/2) - z) - (sigma)/(2*epsilon_0)*((z^2 + r^2)^(1/2) - z)

But I got the answer wrong. Is this equation even correct here? I'm not seeing what I did wrong if it is the right equation to use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that you may want to verify your "Relevant equation". That "-z" term looks suspicious. How did you find this equation?
 
gneill said:
I think that you may want to verify your "Relevant equation". That "-z" term looks suspicious. How did you find this equation?

2rf8u4k.png
 
Ah. The 'z' results from the disk going from radius 0 to radius R. Your disk has a minimum radius that is not zero, so rather than a 'z' term there should be another sqrt(z2 + r2) in its place, where r is the inner radius of the ring.
 
gneill said:
Ah. The 'z' results from the disk going from radius 0 to radius R. Your disk has a minimum radius that is not zero, so rather than a 'z' term there should be another sqrt(z2 + r2) in its place, where r is the inner radius of the ring.

I see, so if I do that it will complete the equation needed to solve this?
 
That should do it, but it might be preferable for you to do the integration and confirm where the term comes from. You might have to do something similar in an exam at some point.
 
True, I know I start with dV = (1/4*pi*e_0) \integral (dQ/r)

Next step would be to say dQ = sigma*dx where sigma = Q/Area. Do I use Area = 4*pi*R^2 here? I'm a bit confused as to how about going to set this up and where the R and r come into play.
 
Yes, it gets a bit confusing because there are so many different r's floating around in this problem. Rename some. Call the distance from a given ring of charge to the point on the z-axis d. That takes the place of the r in the \integral (dQ/r), and is given by sqrt(z2 + x2), where here x is the radius of the given differential ring of charge. The integration limits will be x = r to x = R, corresponding to the radial extremes of the disk.

Have a look http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/potlin.html" for the geometry and setup of the integral.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top