Is non-linearity incontrovertible? What about hidden variables?

kmarinas86
Messages
974
Reaction score
1
Some systems are said to not obey the superposition principle. This is because certain relations are found which are not arrived at by simple addition or subtraction. However, I wonder if some "non-linear systems" can be modeled directly from an underlying set of linear equations. Now, I don't assume that such a set of equations would be finite. One must somehow generate such equations, though not necessarily by using a system of non-linear equations. Is it possible? If so, can such a process theoretically apply to all non-linear systems?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can always approximate a non-linear system by a sufficiently complicated linear system. Is that what you mean?
 
HallsofIvy said:
You can always approximate a non-linear system by a sufficiently complicated linear system.

As long as one remembers that approximate in this case means that there are non-linear system whose behavior cannot be approximated by any (piece-wise) linear approximation of the field. Or in other words, some non-linear systems have behavioral characteristics that will escape any analysis based on linear theory.
 
Paramertize the curve 10 more times!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top