B Is Normal Force a Contact Force Despite Atomic Repulsion?

Click For Summary
Normal force is classified as a contact force, despite the atomic repulsion that occurs at the microscopic level. While objects appear to be touching, there is a minuscule space due to electron repulsion, which prevents true contact on an atomic scale. Contact forces, including normal force, tension, and friction, are part of electromagnetic forces, differing from strong and weak nuclear forces and gravity. On a macroscopic scale, objects can be considered as touching for practical purposes. The discussion raises questions about the technical definition of "touching" in the context of these forces.
Physics4Eva
Messages
13
Reaction score
8
Guys I was just wondering if normal force is a contact force. Obviously it is considered a contact force but it also has something to do with the repelling of atoms. In my mind, normal force is a fundamental truth, but technically, are two objects touching or is there a minuscule space between the object.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics4Eva said:
Guys I was just wondering if normal force is a contact force.
Yes.

Physics4Eva said:
are two objects touching or is there a minuscule space between the object
If they are close enough for contact forces to exist then they are “touching”. It may be that contact forces have some small non zero range.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Physics4Eva
Thanks for the quick reply:wink:
 
Normal forces, and other so-called contact forces like tension and friction forces, belong to the family of forces called electro-magnetic forces (as distinguished from the strong and weak nuclear forces, and the ‘action at a distance’ classical gravity “force”). Being an electromagnetic force, contact forces actually never touch each other on the atomic scale, due to the repulsion of electrons between the objects in contact. For all practical purposes however, they can be considered as touching on the macroscopic scale.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Physics4Eva
Very intuitive😜
 
Physics4Eva said:
... but technically, are two objects touching ...
What is your "technical" definition of touching?

 
  • Like
Likes Physics4Eva and Dale
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Let us take the Ampere-Maxwell law $$\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0\,\mathbf{J}+\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ Assume we produce a spark that is so fast that the ##\partial \mathbf{E}/\partial t## term in eqn.##(1)## has not yet been produced by Faraday’s law of induction $$\nabla \times \mathbf{E}=-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ since the current density ##\mathbf{J}## has not yet had time to generate the magnetic field ##\mathbf{B}##. By...