'Is $ℜ$ an equivalence relation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the relation $ℜ$ defined by $cℜd⇔f′(c)=\frac{1-t}{1-u}f′(d)$ is an equivalence relation, given the conditions of the mean value theorem and the properties of the function $f$. Participants express confusion regarding the assumptions about the roots of $f$, particularly the implications of $u$ being a root and the nature of $f$ as a non-zero analytic function. There is also uncertainty about the role of the variable $t$ and whether it can be freely chosen for each pair $(c,d)$. The need for clarity on the definitions and constraints of the variables involved is emphasized. The discussion ultimately seeks to establish the conditions under which $ℜ$ can be classified as an equivalence relation.
zeraoulia
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The **mean value theorem** says that there exists a $c∈(u,v)$ such that $$f(v)-f(u)=f′(c)(v-u).$$ Here is my question.

Assume that $u$ is a root of $f$, hence we obtain $$f(v)=f′(c)(v-u);$$ assume that $f$ is a non-zero analytic function in the whole real line.

We can define the relation $ℜ$ by
$$cℜd⇔f′(c)=\frac{1-t}{1-u}f′(d)$$

where $u∈ℝ$ such that $f(u)=0$, $c∈(u,v)$ and $t∈ℝ$ such that $f(t)=0$, $d∈(t,v)$, that is we apply the mean value theorem for f in the two intervals $(u,v)$ and $(t,v)$, here $u,t,v$ are arbitrary.

Is $ℜ$ an equivalence relation? If so, determine its equivalence classes.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea to start with.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am confused by your "Assume that u is a root of f", "assume that f is a non-zero function in the whole real line" and "where u such that f(u)= 0".
 
"non-zero function" is equivalent to "NOT (f(x)=0 everywhere)". And the function is defined in the whole real line.

I am confused by that t, however. Do we have some constant t? Are we free to choose t for each pair (c,d) to analyze? What about d, can we choose that as well?
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top