Is Relative Velocity Crucial for Rocket Launch Direction?

AI Thread Summary
Relative velocity is crucial for determining the launch direction of rockets, as launching from west to east takes advantage of the Earth's rotation, increasing the rocket's velocity. This method enhances the rocket's speed by combining its velocity with the Earth's, allowing for more efficient fuel use and a reduced ecological footprint. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding relative velocity in relation to the Earth to achieve specific orbits. Additionally, it clarifies that while the Earth's rotation aids in launch velocity, it does not directly affect the orbit itself. Overall, optimizing launch direction through relative velocity is essential for successful rocket missions.
TheronSimon
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



explain how relative velocity is related to the direction in which rockets are launched...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi TheronSimon! :wink:

Tell us what you think, and then we'll comment! :smile:
 
Since the Earth rotates from west to east, rockets are launched from west to east This is done to aid in increasing the velocity of the rocket because the relative velocity becomes the velocity of the rocket + the velocity of the Earth thus giving the rocket a higher velocity. What this entails is that, the rockets have a higher velocity and so they conserve fuel which in turn helps conserve the environment and having less of an ecological foot print.
 
Yes, that looks good! :smile:

I think you should make this part a little clearer …
TheronSimon said:
… This is done to aid in increasing the velocity of the rocket because the relative velocity becomes the velocity of the rocket + the velocity of the Earth thus giving the rocket a higher velocity.

… you haven't said what the "relative velocity" is relative to (and why it matters in achieving a particular orbit). :wink:
 
would the relative velocity be relative to the earth? since its going into orbit?
 
(just got up :zzz:)

that's right! :smile:

(and the orbit is not affected by the Earth's rotation :wink:)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top