Is Static Friction Necessary on an Incline When Motion Stops?

AI Thread Summary
Static friction is not necessary on an incline when motion stops, as the focus shifts to the forces acting on the object at rest. The discussion highlights confusion about whether to use the coefficient of static or kinetic friction when calculating friction for a coin that comes to rest. It is clarified that when the coin is in motion and then stops, the coefficient of kinetic friction should be applied. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding the direction of friction, which acts up the incline. Overall, the conversation centers on the appropriate application of friction coefficients in different states of motion.
mak66
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
no longer needed
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Would you be able to list the "following circumstances" so we can help you?
 
Sorry about that, it wants to know what the friction is when the coin comes to rest. I know the direction of the friction is up the incline, but other than that I'm stuck.
 
if they ask you to find the friction of the coin in motion or in motion coming to rest then use coefficient of kinetic friction to calculate friction right?

do you know what the sum of all forces are in the x direction?
 
It doesn't give any forces in the x direction, just what I typed. So if it was in motion but came to rest I still use the coefficient of kinetic friction? I was using the coefficient of static friction. What I did was find the normal force and multiply by u static friction.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top