Is stress tensor a 3x3 or 3x3x3 tensor?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of the mechanical stress tensor, questioning whether it is a 3x3 tensor or a 3x3x3 tensor of scalars. It is clarified that the stress tensor is indeed a 3x3 tensor, with its nine entries representing scalar values, while diagrams often illustrate these values as vectors indicating force directions on a block's faces. The notation σ11 signifies the magnitude of the force component in a specific direction, emphasizing that stress is defined as force per unit area. The conversation confirms that stress and strain are both represented as 3x3 tensors. Overall, the stress tensor is understood to be a 3x3 tensor, with the vector representations in diagrams serving to illustrate force components.
Hassan2
Messages
422
Reaction score
5
Hi all,

I have a fundamental question about ( mechanical) stress tensor. Stress tensor a 3x3 tensor whose 9 entries looks "scalars" but in figures, the stress is illustrated by nine "vectors". Does it mean the stress tensors is in fact a 3x3x3 tensor of scalars whose nonzero entries are ignored?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stress and strain are definitely 3x3 tensors.

If you mean diagrams of a rectangular block with arrows attached to the faces, the arrows are showing the direction of the forces acting on the face, i.e. the components of ##\sigma \cdot \bf{n}## where ##\bf{n}## is the normal vector to the face.

If you meant some other diagram, can you post a link to it?
 
Yes those diagrams that you mentioned. So when they write σ11 beside one of the arrows, the arrow is the force component in that defined direction andσ11 tells us about "magnitude" of the force. However it seems to be the force per unit area, otherwise the stress must be multiplied by the surface.

Thanks.
 
Hassan2 said:
So when they write σ11 beside one of the arrows, the arrow is the force component in that defined direction andσ11 tells us about "magnitude" of the force. However it seems to be the force per unit area, otherwise the stress must be multiplied by the surface.
Correct.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top