Is Tension2 always smaller than Tension1 in a tension and pulley system?

AI Thread Summary
In a tension and pulley system with two masses, Tension2 (T2) is always smaller than Tension1 (T1) due to the relationship defined by the equations T2 = mg - ma and T1 = T2 + Mg - Ma. The constant (g-a) must remain positive for T1 to exceed T2, which implies that the acceleration cannot equal gravitational acceleration (g). If acceleration (a) were equal to g, T2 would become zero, contradicting the requirement for tension in the rope. The discussion emphasizes that T2 will always be less than T1 as long as the system is accelerating downwards. Thus, the conclusion is that T2 is consistently smaller than T1 in this setup.
Deadawake
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
tension ropes bigger.jpg


Homework Statement


M = M
There is another mass "m" attached to mass "M" with a rope
There is an acceleration (clockwise)
Does Tension2 smaller,bigger or equal to Tension1?

Homework Equations


F = ma

The Attempt at a Solution


So this is what I understand just by the logic:
In any case - T1 > T2 ,

I tried to put it into equations:
T2 = mg - ma
T1 = T2 +Mg - Ma

→→ T1 = mg - ma + Mg - Ma = m⋅(g-a) + M⋅(g-a)

"(g-a)" is constant value. Hence no matter what is the mass correlation between M & m , T2 will always be smaller than T1

Am I right?


Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Deadawake said:
I tried to put it into equations:
T2 = mg - ma
T1 = T2 +Mg - Ma

→→ T1 = mg - ma + Mg - Ma = m⋅(g-a) + M⋅(g-a)

"(g-a)" is constant value. Hence no matter what is the mass correlation between M & m , T2 will always be smaller than T1

Am I right?
I think you essentially have it, except for maybe one loose end. As you said, (g-a) is a constant. What must be true about this constant in order for your argument to hold?
 
mm..
If g=a we get 0 . which means there is no tension in the ropes?
 
Yes, but could a = g?

Maybe I'm being too picky. But is seems to me that your argument requires that (g-a) be a positive constant.
Your equation T1 = T2 + Mg - Ma can be written as

T1 = T2 +M(g-a).

So, T1 is greater than T2 as long as (g-a) is positive. It's not hard to find a reason why (g-a) is positive.
 
TSny said:
Yes, but could a = g?

Maybe I'm being too picky. But is seems to me that your argument requires that (g-a) be a positive constant.
Your equation T1 = T2 + Mg - Ma can be written as

T1 = T2 +M(g-a).

So, T1 is greater than T2 as long as (g-a) is positive. It's not hard to find a reason why (g-a) is positive.
If "m" is big enough to create 9.8 m/s2 acceleration. so a=g . Logically,I think, it could be the case.
Actually I can't find a reason why "(g-a)" must be positive when "a" is bigger than g... maybe that's the direction of the accelaration? if it minus this term will be always positive. but we already defined the direction of the acceleration within the equation.
so I don't know :confused:
 
Tension in a string cannot be negative. So, your equation T2 = mg - ma implies g - a cannot be negative. So, you just need to rule out a = g which would imply T2 = 0.

If T2 = 0, then the free body diagrams for the two blocks of mass M would be identical. Yet you know that one block must accelerate upward while the other accelerates downward.

[EDIT: Another approach is to treat the system as a whole. Taking clockwise motion around the pulley as positive, the net external force acting on the system is Fnet = mg + Mg - Mg = mg. Thus the acceleration is Fnet divided by the total mass of the system. You can easily check that this is less than g.]
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top