Is Tensor Algebra Necessary to Understand General Relativity?

jainabhs
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hi
Please tell me if tensor algebra is neccesary for understanding GR.
I don't know anything about tensor algebra.

Thanks in anticipation

Abhishek Jain
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. In fact you'll need tensor calculus. Many GR books introduce the necessary math. See some of the threads about GR books for pointers.

In their book Exploring Black Holes, Taylor & Wheeler work out some of the physics of black holes by starting with the Schwartzschild metric as a fait accompli, so they don't have to introduce tensor calculus. (The derivation is done in almost any book on GR and does require an understanding of tensor calculus.) I think they assume a knowledge of SR, though; their discussion of SR is pretty brief. So you may want to work through their book Spacetime Physics first.
 

Thread 'I don't see how a black hole's event horizon can be crossed'

OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
View full post »

Thread 'Synchronizing clocks in an inertial frame if light is anisotropic'

ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
View full post »

Thread 'Is the variation of the metric ##\delta g_{\mu\nu}## a tensor?'

From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
View full post »

Similar threads

I How do Tensors "work" in relation to linear algebraic objects?
Replies
7
Views
268
I How to calculate basis vectors from metric tensor (as a matrix)?
Replies
6
Views
405
A Deriving Essential Quantities from Metric Tensor for GR Calculations
Replies
20
Views
2K
B Why do people care about vacuum solutions in GR?
Replies
9
Views
1K
A Understand (k,l) Tensors in Gen. Relativity
Replies
7
Views
2K
I How to derive irreducible representations/tensors?
Replies
22
Views
3K
A Principal Invariants of the Weyl Tensor
Replies
6
Views
2K
A Why is the Principle of Equivalence Necessary for GTR?
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Purpose of Tensors, Indices in Tensor Calculus Explained
Replies
10
Views
3K
A GW Binary Merger: Riemann Tensor in Source & TT-Gauge
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top