Is the Book's Answer to the Relative Velocity Problem Incorrect?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a perceived discrepancy between the solution to a relative velocity problem involving rain and a man's velocity, as presented in a textbook. The poster argues that their calculated answer, which yields a ratio of m/r = 2/sqrt(5) for tan(theta), is correct, while the book provides the reciprocal, sqrt(5)/2. This inconsistency raises questions about the reliability of the book's answers for similar problems. The poster seeks clarification on who is consistently making this mistake in the context of relative velocity. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate problem-solving in physics and the potential for errors in educational materials.
manjuvenamma
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
I raised this question in the courseware section and I got only one response. To improve the response, I am repeating the question here. Please see it.

I got one answer and the book at the receprocal of my answer. This is not just for this problem for several problems of this nature the answer given in the book is similarly reciprocal of mine. I want to just reconfirm who is consistently making this mistake.


1. Homework Statement
Rain is falling down vertically. To a man walking on the road, velocity of rain appears to be 1.5 times his velocity. Then to protect himself from rain, he holds his umbrella at an angle (theta) to the vertical such that tan (theta) =


2. Homework Equations

The relative velocity of rain to man is R-M where R is rain velocity and M is man's velocity.


3. The Attempt at a Solution

Assume the rain velocity vector is R. We can think it is -rJ. J is a unit vector along y axis. r is the magnitude of rain velocity. The negative sign comes because of the direction of rain - down.

Similarly M = mI where I is unit vector along x axis. The relative velocity of rain to man is R-M = -rJ-mI.

The magnitude of R-M is 1.5m (given).

1.5m = sqrt(r^2+m^2) implies m/r = 2/sqrt(5) = tan(theta).

But the answer stated in the book is the reciprocal i.e. sqrt(5)/2. Who is right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do not post the same topic twice.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top