Is the Canonical Map Z to Zsubscript5 1-1 and Onto?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Punkyc7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Map Proof
Punkyc7
Messages
415
Reaction score
0
Determine if the canonical map Z to Zsubscript5 is 1-1 and onto. Prove your answer


Im not sure how to prove it but I am almost positive that its onto and not 1-1. I believe it onto because Z contains all the integers and Zsubscript5 contain the equivalence classes [0] [1] [2] [3] [4]. I don't believe that its 1-1 because 0 and 5 get mapped onto [0]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your proof looks good to me! You might want to be a bit more explicit about being onto. That is, if I give you the equivalence class [a], what integer gets mapped to [a] by the canonical map?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top