Is the charge distribution for an electric field unique?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the uniqueness theorem in electrostatics, which states that a specific charge distribution and boundary conditions yield a unique solution to Poisson's equation, determining the electric field in that space. However, the reverse question arises: if the electric field and boundary conditions are known, can the charge distribution be uniquely identified? It is argued that this is not the case, as different charge distributions can produce the same electric field, exemplified by a charge distributed on spheres of varying sizes producing identical fields at a given distance. This indicates that knowing the electric field does not guarantee a unique charge distribution. Thus, the charge distribution for an electric field is not unique.
Ganesh Ujwal
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
If the electric field and boundary conditions are known exactly for a region of space, is it true that there exists only one charge distribution in that region of space that could have produced it?

My understanding of the uniqueness theorem in electrostatics is that for a given charge distribution and boundary conditions for a volume, there exists only one (unique) solution to Poisson's equation, and thus the electric field in that volume is uniquely determined. Does the arrow point the other way, too? If we know the field and boundary conditions, is the charge distribution uniquely determined in the volume? Is there a simple example that illustrates why or why not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Charge distributed on a sphere should produce the same electric field regardless of the size of the sphere. For example, if you measure the electric field at a point 1 m from X you can't tell if the the field you observe results from a sphere of 1 cm or 99 cm radius centered at X.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top