Is the Cloud of Hydrogen Gas Likely to Collapse?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Meganwright
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cloud Collapse
Meganwright
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cloud consists of 8 solar masses of hydrogen gas (H2). Its temperature is 20 K and its radius is 0.6 light years. Will it collapse?


Homework Equations


jeans mass


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/b
I've tried to use jeans mass to solve this however I am finding the formula difficult to understand
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show your work.
 
So far I'm using the formula
3/2kT <GMm/R
And (3KT/2Gm) x k >mj

I'm substituting m=2.167x10^-27
G=6.67x10^-11
K=1.38x10^-23
T=20
R=0.6

However I'm not sure what it is exactly that I'm gaining from using these formulae?
I'm getting that (3kT/2Gm) x R = 1.115011357 x 10^15 ?
I'm aiming to get an answer of
Jeans mass = 1.05 x 10^31 kg
Which is less than 8 solar masses (1.6 x 10 ^31) so it will collapse?
 
I struggled to follow your logic above. Seem to be a few typos:
(3KT/2Gm) x k >mj
(3kT/2Gm) x R = Mj ?
(3kT/2Gm) x R = 1.115011357 x 10^15
√((3kT/2Gm) x R) = 1.115011357 x 10^15 ?
Also, I don't see online a formula with that 3/2 factor. I see one with 15/4pi, another that approximates that to 1. Anyway, using your 3/2 I get that the Jeans length/radius = 0.84, which suggests to me it won't collapse. (I'm a bit confused over whether the Jeans length is a radius or a diameter, but if it's a diameter then the actual radius is much too large to collapse.)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top