Is the conservation of energy a statistical phenomena?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on whether the conservation of energy is a fundamental law or a statistical phenomenon. It presents scenarios involving heat engines and quantum mechanics to illustrate that while conservation of energy is generally upheld, improbable events could theoretically lead to temporary violations. The second law of thermodynamics is identified as a statistical law that can be violated under specific conditions, particularly in small systems or during fluctuations, as described by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics, particularly the second law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with heat engines and heat transfer mechanisms
  • Knowledge of quantum mechanics, specifically Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
  • Concepts of statistical mechanics and fluctuations in physical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of thermodynamics and the implications of the second law
  • Explore the mechanics of heat engines and their efficiency
  • Study Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and its applications in quantum physics
  • Investigate statistical mechanics and its role in understanding macroscopic and microscopic systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, thermodynamics researchers, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of energy conservation and statistical laws in physics.

mrspeedybob
Messages
869
Reaction score
65
Suppose you build a heat engine. On one side you have a hot body, on the other side you have a cold body. Between the 2 you have the heat engine but on a parallel path you have a simple heat conductor.

What will happen is that some of the heat will travel through and power the heat engine and some will travel through the heat conductor and do nothing until the 2 bodies are at the same temperature, but heat is just the magnitude of the random motions of atoms/molecules. It seems like it would be possible for random motions to result in heat transfer through the conductor until the hot body is hot again and the cold body is cold again, by pure chance. This would be so improbable that it would likely never be observed happening but I can't see a reason that it should be impossible.


Another scenario where extremely unlikely events could result in a violation of conservation of energy would be on the quantum level. It is my understanding that any given particle has a certain amount of inherent uncertainty in its position and momentum. If a significant percentage of an objects particles spontaneously and simultaneously decided they were going to exist a meter further up the gravity well from their current position that would be observed as a violation of the law of conservation of energy. Again, such an event would be so improbable that it would likely never be observed but improbable does not equal impossible.

So, as the title states, is the law of conservation of energy a fundamental law or the result of statistical probability?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the first case, energy is conserved, but the second law of thermodynamics is not, and yes, the second law is a statistical law, it can be violated. The larger your system is, the less the fluctuations are percentage-wise. For most macroscopic situations the level of fluctuations is usually negligible, but if you are studying Brownian motion, for example, they will not be ignorable.

In the second case, yes, energy conservation can be violated but only for a certain amount of time. The relationship between the amount of energy violation and the time interval over which it occurs is given by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K