Is the direction of resultant force to the left in this problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the direction of the resultant force in a physics problem, where the author initially defines forces to the right as positive. Despite calculating a positive value of 32230N for the x-component, the confusion arises regarding its direction. The consensus is that since the force component is defined as negative, the resultant force indeed acts to the left. Clarification confirms that the resultant force is considered positive when directed leftward. Therefore, the conclusion is that the resultant force does act to the left.
foo9008
Messages
676
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


i am confused about the direction of resultant force . in the working ,it's clear that the author taking to the right as positive ,
for the force component along x-axis , we have -Fx , but , in the calclulation , we gt positive 32230N , so the resultant force of x-component is to the left(32230N ) , am i correct ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • 1.PNG
    1.PNG
    10.9 KB · Views: 354
  • 2.PNG
    2.PNG
    12.3 KB · Views: 387
  • 3.PNG
    3.PNG
    6.7 KB · Views: 392
Physics news on Phys.org
The author is taking Fx to be positive if the force is pointing is the negative x direction.
 
Chestermiller said:
The author is taking Fx to be positive if the force is pointing is the negative x direction.
ia my idea correct / the resultant force act to the left ?
 
foo9008 said:
what do you mean ?
In vector terms, the x component of the force ##\vec{F}## is taken to be ##-F_x\vec{i}_x##, where ##\vec{i}_x## is the unit vector in the positive x direction.
 
Chestermiller said:
In vector terms, the x component of the force ##\vec{F}## is taken to be ##-F_x\vec{i}_x##, where ##\vec{i}_x## is the unit vector in the positive x direction.
is my idea correct ? the resultant force act to the left ?
 
foo9008 said:
is my idea correct ? the resultant force act to the left ?
Yes. It is positive to the left.
 
  • Like
Likes foo9008
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top