B Is the Expansion Rate Truly Accelerating?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the accelerating expansion rate of the universe. It highlights that while distant objects are receding faster due to expansion, this does not necessarily indicate that the expansion rate itself is increasing. The distinction is made between comparing distances at different times for the same object versus tracking different objects over time. The conversation raises questions about how this acceleration affects the time it takes for objects to increase their distance from us. Ultimately, the implications of an accelerating expansion rate on cosmic distances and timelines are explored.
thetexan
Messages
269
Reaction score
13
I'm studying about accelerating expansion rate.

I am reading that the rate of expansion is accelerating. Now the farther objects are from us the faster they are moving away from us due to expansion. Farther and farther, faster and faster. But that would occur even if the expansion rate is steady. Are they saying that the rate of the expansion itself it accelerating? And won't that mean that the time it takes for an object to move from say 10 billion light years to 11 billion light years from us will be longer now that say a billion years from now?

tex
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
"the rate of expansion is accelerating" is not comparing different distances, it is comparing different times for the same object. If we consider an object where the distance increases by c/2 today, its distance will increase slightly faster tomorrow.
thetexan said:
And won't that mean that the time it takes for an object to move from say 10 billion light years to 11 billion light years from us will be longer now that say a billion years from now?
That is yet another comparison, because there we would track different objects.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top