Is the Frictional Force on a Sloped Block Greater Than Its Weight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1Deag4Days
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Rest Slope
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the relationship between the frictional force and the weight of a block resting on a rough incline. Initially, there is confusion about whether the frictional force is greater than, equal to, or less than the block's weight. It is clarified that the frictional force should be equal to the component of the weight acting along the slope, not greater. A misunderstanding about the decomposition of gravitational forces is acknowledged, leading to the realization that the initial calculations were incorrect. Ultimately, the correct approach involves accurately analyzing the forces acting on the block.
1Deag4Days
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block is at rest on a rough incline .
The frictional force acting on the block, along the incline, is
A) greater than the weight of the block.
B) equal to the weight of the block.
C) zero.
D) less than the weight of the block.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The frictional force should be equal to the Weight along the slope so MG/sin(theta) so shouldn't the frictional force be greater than the weight of the block?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The weight along the slope is greater than the total weight?

How do you get MG/sin(theta)? That would imply, as the angle theta goes to zero, the weight along the slope goes to infinity. Is that reasonable?
 
I know I'm doing something wrong but i don't know what
 

Attachments

  • physics.png
    physics.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 542
Nvm I got it I was decomposing my gravitational force vector incorrectly
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top