Is the Ion Bound with this Energy Minimization?

  • Thread starter Thread starter schlegelii
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bound Ion
schlegelii
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
There exists some ion with a hamiltonian H = H0 + H1. The expectation value of H0 is ## \frac{\hbar ^2}{m} a^2 - 2 e^2 a## and the expectation value of H1 is ##\frac{5}{8} e^2 a##, where ##a## is some parameter with units of inverse length. Is the ion bound?
Relevant Equations
H = H0 + H1
expectation value of H0 is ## \frac{\hbar ^2}{m} a^2 - 2 e^2 a##
expectation value of H1 is ##\frac{5}{8} e^2 a##
From what we did in class, I think we need to minimize the energy with respect to a.

Like ##E = \frac{\hbar ^2}{m} a^2 - 2 e^2 a + \frac{5}{8} e^2 a = \frac{\hbar ^2}{m} a^2 - \frac{11}{8} e^2 a ##, then minimize it

Finding the minimum value: ## - (\frac{11}{16})^2 \frac{m e^4}{\hbar^2} ## when ## a = \frac{11 m}{16 \hbar ^2} e^2 ##

I am not sure how to tell if this means the ion is bound or not?? The energy is negative, but does that help??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. According to variational principle $$E_g\leq <\text H>$$. Since tighetst upper bound you have founded is negative,it is bounded.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top