Is the law of sines ever incorrect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 838
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Law of sines
AI Thread Summary
The law of sines is considered valid in Euclidean geometry, with no evidence of it being incorrect in this context. A mathematics grad student claimed to have proven it wrong, but the discussion suggests he may have been referring to non-Euclidean geometry, where the law does not apply. Many participants emphasize that the law of sines is consistently reliable in their experiences and is widely accepted in educational materials. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity in mathematical discussions, especially regarding different geometrical frameworks. Overall, the law of sines remains a foundational principle in Euclidean geometry.
838
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I got into an argument with a mathematics grad student about the law of sines. He said that he has proven it to be wrong several times. I don't see how this is possible, given that the angles are opposing the sides, it doesn't seem possible for it to be EVER incorrect.

I asked him to prove it for me but he said he didn't have time.

Does anyone know about this being invalid?

In my years of studying engineering, I have NEVER found the law of sines to give me a false answer.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If it was wrong, why would it be in all the books? Maybe he means sperical geometry, or something else.
 
as robert said, the grad student may have been talking about some non-Eulidean geometry.

If we take away one of Euclid's axioms, we make all new geometries and some of our inferences such as the law of sines may disappear.

Anyway, ask him about it again and put it on the forum.
 
Some grad students are fools, some are just wise-acres.

Many like to put undergraduates on.

Yes, in non-Euclidean geometry, the "sin law" is not true. If you look at your textbooks, you will see that they never claimed it to be true except in Euclidean geometry.

If your grad student actually thought he had proven the "sin law" to be false in Euclidean geometry, he is a fool. If he meant "in non-Euclidean" geometry, but did not specify that, he is a wise-acre. I don't recommend hanging around with either sort.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top