Is the Linear Attenuation Coefficient Proportional to Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The linear attenuation coefficient is not linearly proportional to energy; it varies based on material properties and photon energy. Users should not interpolate values from graphs without reliable sources, as this can lead to inaccuracies. For accurate values, it is recommended to consult the NIST website or use XCOM software. The relationship between the attenuation coefficient and material properties can be expressed mathematically, emphasizing the importance of using correct data. Accurate determination of the coefficient is crucial for reliable calculations in applications involving photon interactions.
timmo567
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
is the linear attenuation coefficient named like it is because it is linearly proportional (inversely) to the energy?

I have to read off the coefficient from a graph I have. I have the value for a 2MeV photon, if I want the value for a 1MeV photon is it simply twice the 2MeV value? Reading off the value for the 1MeV photon my value is close to twice the 2MeV value, so I'm wondering if it is meant to be off or is it an error? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No..you should not interpolate the graph. Linear attenuation coefficient should be determined from reliable sources..refer to NIST website.
Or you find from online using XCOM software.
<br /> A_{\rm mat}=A_0\exp\left(\frac{\mu}{\rho}t_{\rm mat}\rho\right)<br />
where \frac{A_{\rm mat}}{A_0} is the transmission through materials 'mat'
\mu, \rho are linear att. coefficient and density of 'mat'.
t_{\rm mar} thickness of 'mat'.
the value \frac{\mu}{\rho} can obtained from NIST website for 1 MeV
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top