Is the Mapping h(x)=x3 + x Injective and Surjective?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sunnyday11
  • Start date Start date
sunnyday11
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Decide with proof whether the mapping is injective and/or surjective.

Let f: A-->B be a mapping.

h: C--> C; h(x)=x3 + x (complex field)

f: Z--> Z; h(x)=x3 + x (integer field)

Homework Equations



injective means f(a)=f(a') => a=a'
surjective means for all b belong to B, there exists a belong to A such that f(a)=b

The Attempt at a Solution



For injectivity, I sub a and a' into equations h and f but I have no idea how to equate them or to prove them false.

For subjectivity the same issue arises, I try to get a inverse of the equation since I think they are surjective and can't think of any example to contradict it.

Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When I first saw your question, I thought it might be wise to play a bit with the function to see if something cool props up.

First, I decided to find the roots of the functions. That is, find the x-values such that x3+x=0. Can you find these for me? Do these roots already tell us something about injectivity/surjectivity?
 
The roots are 0 and i.

So for injectivity, h is not injective since both 0 and i lead to the same result; f on the other hand is injective since only 0 is in its field.

For surjectivity, I still can't think of anything to prove.
 
Well, fix a in C. Does there exist a point x such that x3 + x = a? Try moving everything to the same side. What theorem can we use?
 
x3 + x - a = 0

Sorry, I am not quite familiar with the complex plane, can you give me a hint of theorem you mentioned?
 
I'm assuming you can use the fundamental theorem of algebra. If you can't, there's always the cubic formula.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top