Is the Net Force on a Hockey Puck Correctly Calculated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pt20army
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net force acting on a hockey puck on a frictionless surface, considering three forces applied at specific angles. The calculations for the x and y components of each force are provided, but the user struggles with the correct summation of these components. It is emphasized that the signs of the components must be accurately accounted for during the addition. The correct approach involves summing the x components and y components separately to find the net force. The resolution of the calculation error is essential for determining the accurate net force on the puck.
pt20army
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The following forces act on a hockey puck (round, rubber disk) sitting on a frictionless surface: F_1 = 15.5 N at 15 degrees; F_2 = 27.9 N at 125 degrees; and F_3 = 31.7 N at 235 degrees. All the forces are in the plane of the ice. Determine the net force on the puck.


Fnetx= F1x-F2x-F3x=max, Fnety= F1y+F2y-F3y=may



F1x=15.5Ncos15=14.97
F1y=15.5Nsin15=4.01
F2x=27.9Ncos125= -16
F2y=27.9Nsin125=22.85
F3x=31.7Ncos235=-18.18
F3y=31.7Nsin235= -25.96

Fnetx=14.97+16+18.18=49.15
Fnety=4.01+22.85+25.96=52.82

Im getting this problem wrong and I am not sure where I am messing up.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't ignore the signs of the components when you add them up.
 
pt20army said:
Fnetx= F1x-F2x-F3x=max, Fnety= F1y+F2y-F3y=may

You should simply sum the forces with the values you've computed for the x and y components:

Fnetx = F1x + F2x + F3x and similarly for Fnety
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top