Is the Oscillation Period Formula for an Elastic Band the Same as for a Spring?

Thread starter Tommy1995
Start date Mar 11, 2013
Tags

Band Elastic Period

AI Thread Summary

The formula for the period of oscillation for a mass attached to an elastic band can be similar to that of a spring, expressed as T=2∏(√m/k). However, this equivalence holds only if the assumptions made during the derivation for the spring also apply to the elastic band. Factors such as the material properties and the degree of elasticity must be considered. If the elastic band behaves linearly and adheres to Hooke's law, the formula is valid. Therefore, the conditions of the oscillation system are crucial for the accuracy of the formula.

Mar 11, 2013

Tommy1995

Assume that a mass is attached to an elastic band and then allowed to oscillate.

Would the formula for the period of oscillation be that as the same of the formula for the period of the oscillation for a spring.

T=2∏(√m/k) ?

Physics news on Phys.org

Mar 11, 2013

DrClaude

Mentor

Only if all the approximations you made concerning the spring when deriving this formula also apply to the elastic band.

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...

View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

View full post »

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

View full post »