Is the phase shift of a tuned mass damper ##\frac{\pi}{2}## or ##\pi##?

AI Thread Summary
The phase shift of a tuned mass damper (TMD) in relation to the oscillation of a surrounding structure is debated, with simple resonance theory suggesting a phase shift of π/2, while many animations depict it as π. Conflicting sources indicate that ideally, a 90-degree phase difference is achieved by tuning the TMD to the natural frequency of the structure, yet some sources assert that TMDs operate 180 degrees out of phase. The discussion highlights that the force of the TMD should counteract the velocity of the structure, leading to a phase shift of π at resonance due to frictional forces. Additionally, the interaction between coupled resonant systems can result in complex phase relationships, but the central frequency still maintains a π phase shift. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for effectively implementing TMDs in vibration control systems.
greypilgrim
Messages
579
Reaction score
44
Hi.

What is the phase shift of a tuned mass damper with respect to the oscillation of the surrounding structure, such as the big pendulum in Taipei 101? Simple resonance theory would suggest ##\frac{\pi}{2}##, but animations in explanatory videos often depict them in anti-phase, i.e. a phase shift of ##\pi##.

I tried Google but couldn't get a clear result. This document here even seems to be contradictory, on p. 2 it says
The ideal extent of phase difference between the motion of the TMD mass and that of the structure, i.e. 90 degrees, is attained by tuning the TMD to the natural frequency of the structural mode targeted for damping.
whereas on p. 5
Typically TMDs are integrated into the building frame in such a way that the TMD's mass moves 180 degrees out of phase with the building.
Some sources even explain those systems with destructive interference (where anti-phase would make sense), but isn't that something very different and not really related to resonance?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Start with basic vibration theory for a simple spring-mass system without damping. The force of the spring is proportional to the position of the mass. If you add an external force that is proportional to the position of the mass, you change the spring constant, which changes the natural frequency without adding damping.

Now take a simple spring-mass-damper system. The force of the damper is proportional to the velocity of the mass. The velocity is zero at the extreme positions, and maximum at zero position. If you are using a TMD to reduce vibration, you want the force of the tuned mass to be proportional to and opposite the velocity of the structure. The force of the tuned mass is proportional to the relative displacement between the tuned mass and the vibrating structure.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes DaveE and berkeman
Any resonator will present a purely resistive, or frictional, force at its resonant frequency. The generator then does work against this friction. As friction opposes the generator, we say the phase shift is pi radians.
Where we have two coupled resonant devices, the combined system may have a double resonance, depending on the amount of coupling. But at the centre frequency it will still create a phase shift of pi radians.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Thread 'Calculate minimum RPM to self-balance a CMG on two legs'
Here is a photo of a rough drawing of my apparatus that I have built many times and works. I would like to have a formula to give me the RPM necessary for the gyroscope to balance itself on the two legs (screws). I asked Claude to give me a formula and it gave me the following: Let me calculate the required RPM foreffective stabilization. I'll use the principles of gyroscopicprecession and the moment of inertia. First, let's calculate the keyparameters: 1. Moment of inertia of...
Back
Top