MHB Is the Product of Two Diagonalizable Matrices Always Diagonalizable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
The product of two diagonalizable matrices A and B is not always diagonalizable, even if both matrices are invertible. An example provided shows that two specific diagonalizable matrices can yield a non-diagonalizable product. However, if matrices A and B commute (i.e., AB = BA), then their product is diagonalizable because they can be simultaneously diagonalized. In this case, there exists an invertible matrix S that diagonalizes both A and B. Therefore, the diagonalizability of the product depends on the relationship between the two matrices.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello

I have a little question

if A and B are both invertible and diagonalizable matrices (from the same order), is A*B a diagonalizable matrix ? why ?

I have not got a clue...

thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yankel said:
if A and B are both invertible and diagonalizable matrices (from the same order), is A*B a diagonalizable matrix ? why ?

It is not true. Verify that $A=\begin{bmatrix}1&{\;\;1}\\{2}&{-1}\end{bmatrix}$ and $ B=\begin{bmatrix}{1}&{2}\\{2}&{1}\end{bmatrix}$ are invertible and diagonalzable matrices on $\mathbb{R}$, however $AB=\begin{bmatrix}{3}&{3}\\{0}&{3}\end{bmatrix}$ it is not diagonalizable.
 
Yankel said:
Hello

I have a little question

if A and B are both invertible and diagonalizable matrices (from the same order), is A*B a diagonalizable matrix ? why ?

I have not got a clue...

thanks !

Not always. But when A,B are interchangable, i.e., AB=BA, then AB IS diagonalizable since then A and B are simultaneously diagonalizable, i.e., we can find the same invertible matrix
S such that $A=S^{-1} D_1 S, B=S^{-1} D_2 S$, where $D_1,D_2$ are both diagonal matrices. Thus we have $AB=S^{-1}D S$ with $D=D_1D_2$ a diagonal matrix.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K