Is the Rank of Matrix A Equal to the Rank of Matrix M?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EvLer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix rank
EvLer
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
This is a T/F - prove type of question:

A is m x n, M is matrix of TA with respect to bases B of R^m and B' of R^n. Then rank of A = rank of M.

My reasoning is that it is true, since the lin. transf. is R^n->R^m, which means that in this formula:

M = CB' A PB (CB' (coord matrix) is inverse of PB', and PB or PB' stands for point matrix with respect to the B or B' basis, respectively)

PB has dimension n and PB' has dimension m, and CB' has the same dimension as PB' (inverting a matrix should not change dimension, right?). And it also should be true that both PB and CB' are square matrices (?) because they are invertible and we can invert only square matrices (?), so what I have is following composition of dimensions of the matrices in the formula for M:

(m x m) (m x n) (n x n) = (m x n)

Is this correct?
Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is T? you've just introduced TA without explaining what it T is.
 
matt grime said:
What is T? you've just introduced TA without explaining what it T is.
Oh, sorry, T stands for linear transformation.
Here is the full definition of the formula:
M = CB' A PB,
A is (m x n) matrix, B basis for R^n , B' basis for R^m, M matrix of TA: R^n->R^m with respec to basis B and B'.
 
Your question still confuses me a little.

Can I suggest: let A be linear map from V to W, and T a linear marp from W to itself, Is the rank of A the same as the rank of TA?

The answer is trivially no: let A be non-zero, and T be zero.

Unless, by linear transformation you mean something other than what I take it to mean.
 
the rank of a matrix is the dimension of the image of the corresponding linear map. hence it makes no difference what basis you use to express it.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top