Is the Resistance of this Easy Circuit Really Just 10 Ohms?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmcgraw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the resistance of a circuit, specifically questioning whether it is 10 ohms. It is concluded that the right-side resistor does not contribute to resistance due to having the same potential at both ends, resulting in zero current through it. Therefore, only the left resistor, which is 10 ohms, affects the total resistance. Participants clarify that a resistor in parallel with a short-circuit has zero equivalent resistance, while a resistor in series with a short-circuit retains its resistance value. The conversation emphasizes understanding current flow and resistance in circuit configurations.
jmcgraw
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Is the resistance of this circuit 10 ohms?

http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/9229/littlecircuitro8.jpg

I can't prove anything to myself since the resistors aren't in parallel or series.

I do notice that the potential at the top of the right side resistor is the same as at the bottom... So by Ohm's law the current through it should be zero, and so it's just sitting there not resisting anything. Hence, only the left resistor provides resistance to the circuit and R_total = 10 ohms.

Am I correct? Because this just seems counter intuitive.Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. I don´t see why do you say it is counter intuitive.
The equivalent resistance of a resistor in parallel with a short-circuit is a short circuit.
The equivalent resistance of a resistor in series with a short-circuit is the resistance of the resistor.
 
I dunno... It just seems to me like perhaps a little bit of the current would get through. :smile:

I guess if I looked at it as the current taking the path of least resistence, then yeah, I guess it's pretty intuitive. (Although, obviously, such an analogy couldn't extend to resistors in parallel)

Anyways... Thanks!
 
jmcgraw said:
I dunno... It just seems to me like perhaps a little bit of the current would get through. :smile:

I guess if I looked at it as the current taking the path of least resistence, then yeah, I guess it's pretty intuitive. (Although, obviously, such an analogy couldn't extend to resistors in parallel)

Anyways... Thanks!
Such analogy extends to resistors in parallel. The short-circuit has zero resistance, so all the current passes through it.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top