Is the scalar multiplication of (R>0)^n over Q associative?

ilyas.h
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let ℝ>0 together with multiplication denote the reals greater than zero, be an abelian group.

let (R>0)^n denote the n-fold Cartesian product of R>0 with itself.

furthermore, let a ∈ Q and b ∈ (ℝ>0)^n

we put a⊗b = (b_1)^a + (b_2)^a + ... + (b_n)^a

show that the abelian group (R>0)^n together with scalar multiplication

Q x (R>0)^n = (R>0)^n,
(a, b) = (a⊗b)

be a vector space over Q.

The Attempt at a Solution



proof of associativity:

p,q in Q
b in (R>0)^n

p(qb) = (pq)b

===> p(q ⊗ b) = (pq)⊗b

LHS:

p(q⊗b) = p⊗((b_1)^q + (b_2)^q + ... + (b_n)^q)

= ((b_1)^{pq} + (b_2)^{pq} + ... + (b_n)^{pq})

∴associativity true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ilyas.h said:

Homework Statement


Let ℝ>0 together with multiplication denote the reals greater than zero, be an abelian group.

let (R>0)^n denote the n-fold Cartesian product of R>0 with itself.

furthermore, let a ∈ Q and b ∈ (ℝ>0)^n

we put a⊗b = (b_1)^a + (b_2)^a + ... + (b_n)^a

show that the abelian group (R>0)^n together with scalar multiplication

Q x (R>0)^n = (R>0)^n,
(a, b) = (a⊗b)

be a vector space over Q.

The Attempt at a Solution



proof of associativity:

p,q in Q
b in (R>0)^n

p(qb) = (pq)b

===> p(q ⊗ b) = (pq)⊗b

LHS:

p(q⊗b) = p⊗((b_1)^q + (b_2)^q + ... + (b_n)^q)

= ((b_1)^{pq} + (b_2)^{pq} + ... + (b_n)^{pq})

∴associativity true.

So far so good. What's your question?
 
Dick said:
So far so good. What's your question?

just wanted to clarify if my logic is correct, I struggle on these sorts of Q's. Thanks.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top