Is the Second Hint for Newton's Law of Restitution Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Harmony
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Newton's law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on verifying the correctness of the second hint related to Newton's Law of Restitution. Participants confirm that the coefficient of restitution measures the ratio of relative velocities during separation and approach. There is clarification that only the vertical component of velocity is relevant in the context of the second question, as it aligns with the normal direction. The conclusion emphasizes that this consideration is consistent with the principles of the law. Overall, the hints provided in the blog post are deemed accurate.
Harmony
Messages
201
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://mediocre.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/Newtons-law-of-restitution/
Shown in my blog, link provided.

Homework Equations


Newton's Law of Restitution, v2 - v1 = e (u1 - u2)


The Attempt at a Solution


I have done the question, actually...but I need confirmation. Can anyone please help me to check whether the no.2 hint is correct or not? (Located at the bottom of the post)

Thanks in advanced.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quite correct. The coefficient of restitution is the ratio of the magnitude of the relative velocity of separation to that of the relative velocity of approach in the normal direction.
 
Yeah, but though I get the answer, I am not sure why only the vertical component of velocity is considered in the 2nd question. Or am I wrong?
 
No, you are right. The vertical component is in the normal direction. For now, you can take it to be a law of nature.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top