Is the Taylor Series Method Valid for Proving the Irrationality of ln(π)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aspiring
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Idea
Aspiring
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
If we set out to prove the irrationality of the natural logarithm of π (pie), by writing out the Taylor series centered at zero for the function y=π^x, with x=1, we have:

π=1+Sum(ln^k(π)/k!) from k=1 to infinity.

Since we know π is irrational, then ln(π) must be irrational or otherwise π=(a+b)/b

For integer a and b, why is this not correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aspiring said:
If we set out to prove the irrationality of the natural logarithm of π (pie), by writing out the Taylor series centered at zero for the function y=π^x, with x=1, we have:

π=1+Sum(ln^k(π)/k!) from k=1 to infinity.

Since we know π is irrational, then ln(π) must be irrational or otherwise π=(a+b)/b

For integer a and b, why is this not correct?


Because any real number is the limit of a rational sequence, and series play this game, too. For example, we know the number \,e\, is irrational, yet

$$e=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{k!}$$

so, according to your idea, we'd get that \,1\, is irrational...

DonAntonio
 
Aw of course, i see now, thanks.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top