Is the Upper Optical Path Longer than the Lower One in Diagram 2?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the optical paths in Diagram 2, it is established that the upper ray (S1P - t + ut) is longer than the lower ray (S2P) due to the refractive index (u) being greater than 1 for regular materials. This leads to the conclusion that the optical path of the upper ray exceeds that of the lower ray. The confusion arises from the calculation suggesting a negative thickness (mt t), which is incorrect. The relationship between the paths indicates that the upper ray's optical path is indeed longer. Understanding the impact of the refractive index is crucial in this analysis.
desmond iking
Messages
284
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



for diagram 2 , i just can't understand why S1P -t + ut (upper ray ) is longer than the lower light ray (S2P) , ? if I take S2P minus ( S1P -t + ut ) , then i would get mt t (thickness ) is negative , which is indeed wrong! so it has shown that optical path of the upper ray is longer than the optical path of lower ray ...

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMG_20140825_235618[1].jpg
    IMG_20140825_235618[1].jpg
    19.9 KB · Views: 440
Physics news on Phys.org
S1P - t + ut > S2P if u>1, as S2P=S1P based on the upper diagram. I guess u is your refractive index? Regular materials have a refractive index larger than 1, so the upper path is longer.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top