Is the Work-Energy Principle Valid Without Friction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the validity of various statements related to the work-energy principle in the context of frictionless scenarios. The correct answers to the true or false statements are identified as FTFFTF. Key points include that the work done to raise an object does not depend on the time taken, and kinetic energy is independent of motion direction and cannot be negative. Additionally, the work-energy principle remains valid in the absence of friction. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these concepts for accurate problem-solving in physics.
evan b
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement





Select T-True, F-False, for each statement. If the first is T and the rest F, enter TFFFFF.

A) The work done to raise a box onto a platform depends on how much time it takes to raise it. (Neglect friction, assume it starts on the ground at rest, and ends up resting on the platform)
B) The work done by a constant force acting on an object depends on the orientation of the force relative to the motion of the object
C) Work can be done in the absence of motion.
D) The kinetic energy of an object depends on the direction of the motion involved.
E) The kinetic energy can never be negative.
F) The work-energy principle is not valid if there are frictional forces acting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evan b said:

Homework Statement



Select T-True, F-False, for each statement. If the first is T and the rest F, enter TFFFFF.

A) The work done to raise a box onto a platform depends on how much time it takes to raise it. (Neglect friction, assume it starts on the ground at rest, and ends up resting on the platform)
B) The work done by a constant force acting on an object depends on the orientation of the force relative to the motion of the object
C) Work can be done in the absence of motion.
D) The kinetic energy of an object depends on the direction of the motion involved.
E) The kinetic energy can never be negative.
F) The work-energy principle is not valid if there are frictional forces acting.

One thing that is definitely true here is that you have to show some effort if you want some help.

So with that in mind, what are your thoughts on the statements?
 
i finaly figured it out. it was FTFFTF.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top