Is There a Connection Between Physics and Technology?

AI Thread Summary
Physics is fundamentally the study of the natural world, which encompasses but is not limited to technology. While technology includes various applications like cars and computers, it is more accurately linked to engineering, which applies principles of physics. Understanding the distinction between physics and technology can be challenging, as many people conflate the two. Engineering serves as the bridge between theoretical physics and practical technology applications. A deeper understanding of physics can clarify these relationships and enhance comprehension of technological advancements.
starjar
Messages
5
Reaction score
0


http://imgwe.com/accessbee/27/1.png Hi[/URL] I'm new here. Wanted to ask is physics related to studying technology also?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not necessarily. Physics is the study of the natural world, which includes but is not limited to technology. Additionally, the topic of technology itself is extremely broad, but I assume what you refer to by "technology" are things like cars, computers, televisions, ipods, airplanes etc.. am I right?
If that is what you are asking about then the area of science that you might want to look at is, I believe, Engineering, although as I said, all of that is contained within physics just at a more fundamental level which might not be readily applicable to such things.
I'm always surprised at how many people don't know what Physics actually is, and it's always hard to give a definition of it lol. I hope I did ok.
But really, you should try and get a better understanding yourself of what it is, try googling it.
First link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics
 
Oddbio said:
Not necessarily. Physics is the study of the natural world, which includes but is not limited to technology. Additionally, the topic of technology itself is extremely broad, but I assume what you refer to by "technology" are things like cars, computers, televisions, ipods, airplanes etc.. am I right?
If that is what you are asking about then the area of science that you might want to look at is, I believe, Engineering, although as I said, all of that is contained within physics just at a more fundamental level which might not be readily applicable to such things.
I'm always surprised at how many people don't know what Physics actually is, and it's always hard to give a definition of it lol. I hope I did ok.
But really, you should try and get a better understanding yourself of what it is, try googling it.
First link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics

I totally understand. It's just that it's hard to understand when you don't know a lot of things and I tend to mix the word physics with many other things. Thanks.
 
Technology is a applied Engineering.
Engineering is applied Physics.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top