Is there a definition of "hyperdimensional resonance"?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter danrussotti
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Resonance
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the term "hyperdimensional resonance," exploring its meaning and whether it represents a legitimate concept in physics or is merely a playful or nonsensical phrase. Participants examine the context in which the term was used and its implications in both theoretical and practical realms.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification, Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that while the individual terms "hyperdimensional" and "resonance" have meanings, there is no established phenomenon in mainstream physics that combines them into a coherent concept.
  • One participant mentions a historical reference to a "Hyperdimensional Resonator" device from the 1980s, suggesting that the term may have been used in a non-serious context.
  • Another participant speculates that the physicist might have miscommunicated or used the term humorously, possibly to critique pseudoscientific ideas.
  • There is a suggestion that resonant behavior can occur in systems with more than three dimensions, but this does not necessarily validate the term "hyperdimensional resonance" as a recognized concept.
  • Some participants express doubt about the seriousness of the term, indicating it may be associated with "woo" or fringe science.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that "hyperdimensional resonance" lacks a formal definition in physics and may not be a serious concept. However, there is no consensus on the intent behind the original statement made by the physicist, with some suggesting it was a joke while others remain uncertain.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the ambiguity surrounding the term and its potential connections to non-mainstream ideas, but does not resolve the question of its validity or meaning in a scientific context.

danrussotti
I was talking to a friend recently and he said something to me that i just didn't understand. He is a physicist and i most certainly am not. I was telling him about similarities that i had observed between two things and was not sure if it was a coincidence or if there was a tangible link between these two things. His response to me, i didn't quite understand. Bottom line is, I'm not sure if he was just fooling with me or if his statement had meaning. His response was one sentence:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We'd call that an excellent example of "hyperdimensional resonance" ... :)

Thanks.

RCH

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Any input would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The terms have meaning separately, but together, there is no mainstream physics phenomenon that would be described in those words. Some google searching reveals that there was a guy in the 1980s that sold a device called a "Hyperdimensional Resonator" that he purported to be a time-travel device. It's possible that your friend was joking around.
 
fzero said:
The terms have meaning separately, but together, there is no mainstream physics phenomenon that would be described in those words. Some google searching reveals that there was a guy in the 1980s that sold a device called a "Hyperdimensional Resonator" that he purported to be a time-travel device. It's possible that your friend was joking around.

Yes, that seems to be the safe conclusion. I found very similar results with my web search. Thanks for your reply, its much appreciated.
 
I don't know of any phenomena by that name, so if he is a physicist maybe you misheard him or he mis-spoke?

It's definitely possible for a system of more than 3 variables (ie more than 3-dimensions) to have resonant behavior, or he may have been referring to some kind of resonant behavior of a differential equation on a manifold, and in trying to describe something of these sorts he may have chosen his words poorly (we all do that sometimes).

Or maybe he was just being tongue-in-cheek about an idea that sounded like woo and made up some nonsense words to criticize it as such, like if I sarcastically said that something was "clearly an example of irreducible complexity" or that one struggling with a computer problem ought to "download more RAM".

Though, out of curiosity, I did a Google search of "hyperdimensional resonance" and found a few people offering "hyperdimensional resonators" for sale or instructions for how to build them, and they all look like woo and free energy sites.
 
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
danrussotti said:
We'd call that an excellent example of "hyperdimensional resonance" ... :)
@danrussotti, your physicist friend was pulling your leg...
 
Thread will remain closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
856
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 92 ·
4
Replies
92
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K