Is there a formula for such a thing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kruger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Kruger
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
Imagine following situation:

The whole space is in vacuum state.
We place in this space a nucleus with some charge X.
Now, there are everywhere vacuum fluctuations and thus the charge we measure near this nucleus is smaller than its effective charge (vacuum polarisation). Now, how big is this polarisation? I mean is there a formula we can calculate the charge we measure with a distance R apart from nucleus if the effective charge X of the nucleus is given?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kruger said:
Imagine following situation:

The whole space is in vacuum state.
We place in this space a nucleus with some charge X.
Now, there are everywhere vacuum fluctuations and thus the charge we measure near this nucleus is smaller than its effective charge (vacuum polarisation). Now, how big is this polarisation? I mean is there a formula we can calculate the charge we measure with a distance R apart from nucleus if the effective charge X of the nucleus is given?

If you are talking about how the physical vacuum influences real time interactions, than "vacuum polarization tensor" is the concept to look for. This tensor expresses the fact that if you replace the vacuum by a dielectric (this is the Dirac-virtual particle sea) that is built out of virtual electron positron pairs, these pairs will behave like ordinary dipoles if you introduce a charge. Plus, this charge will also get screened ofcourse.

regards
marlon
 
Another question:
Can a real photon have self energy? In the case of self energy a photon could split in an electron and a positron. But this is not possible. If this creation wants to be possible there most be energy taken from Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. But if so, the created electron and positron would not be real. So we would have a real photon at beginning and an intermediate state where all particles are virtual and then a final state where all particles (the photon) are real. Can't we then measure the e- and e+ created by the self energy of the real photon?
 
Kruger said:
Another question:
Can a real photon have self energy?

I do not understand this question. I mean, self energy is a purely QM effect that arises when there is some interaction between particles is going on. Keep in mind that self energy arises because of perturbationtheory, which is used for describing interactions. Yes a photon can interact with the Dirac sea (that is what the polarizationtensor is used for) and yes a photon can be converted (temporarily) into a electron-positron pair. I refer to the Feynman diagrams on http://www.oup.co.uk/pdf/0-19-852913-9.pdf

But keep in mind that we are looking at the interaction between a photon,positron and an electron.

marlon
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top