These people talk as if there might be : ^)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.05352
Black hole spectroscopy from Loop Quantum Gravity models
Aurelien Barrau,
Xiangyu Cao,
Karim Noui,
Alejandro Perez
(Submitted on 21 Apr 2015)
Using Monte Carlo simulations, we compute the integrated emission spectra of black holes in the framework of Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG). The black hole emission rates are governed by the entropy whose value,
in recent holographic loop quantum gravity models, was shown to agree at leading order with the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. Quantum corrections depend on the Barbero-Immirzi parameter γ. Starting with black holes of initial horizon area A∼102 in Planck units, we present the spectra for different values of γ. Each spectrum clearly decomposes in two distinct parts: a continuous background which corresponds to the semi-classical stages of the evaporation and a series of discrete peaks which constitutes a signature of the deep quantum structure of the black hole. We show that γ has an effect on both parts that we analyze in details. Finally, we estimate the number of black holes and the instrumental resolution required to experimentally distinguish between the considered models.
11 pages, 9 figures
But I don't think their idea of holographic LQG models corresponds at level of details to the AdS/CFT picture you suggest in your example.
==excerpt from page 4==
As explained in the introduction, a fundamental understanding of the holographic hypothesis in the models leading to (15) might come from the recent results [24, 25, 33] that indicate a relationship between holography and LQG for complex Ashtekar variables (γ = ±i). ...
==endquote==
You might have a look at their references [24,25,32,33] just in case...