Is there a holographic principle in loop quantum gravity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the holographic principle and loop quantum gravity (LQG), exploring whether LQG can be considered a serious proposal for quantum gravity that respects this principle. Participants examine theoretical implications, potential dualities with conformal field theories, and the nature of information in gravitational theories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question if loop quantum gravity in four dimensions is dual to a conformal field theory in three dimensions.
  • One participant references a paper discussing black hole spectroscopy in LQG, noting that while it suggests a relationship between holography and LQG, it may not align with the AdS/CFT correspondence.
  • Several questions are posed regarding the necessity of the holographic principle in serious quantum gravity proposals and whether LQG respects this principle.
  • Another participant suggests that any theory of gravity might inherently possess a holographic aspect, relating it to the information available to observers based on emitted signals and enclosing surfaces.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the fundamental importance of the holographic principle, arguing that in an expanding universe, entropy may not be constrained to surface area as the principle suggests.
  • A later reply indicates that defining the concept of a boundary in the context of LQG is essential for addressing the questions raised.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the relationship between the holographic principle and loop quantum gravity, with no consensus reached on whether LQG respects the holographic principle or its implications. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clear definitions and frameworks when discussing the holographic principle and its relevance to loop quantum gravity, indicating potential limitations in understanding and interpretation.

kodama
Messages
1,090
Reaction score
144
for example, is loop quantum gravity/SF in 4 dimensions dual to a CFT in 3 dimensions?

does a serious proposal of QG have to respect the holographic principle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These people talk as if there might be : ^)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.05352
Black hole spectroscopy from Loop Quantum Gravity models
Aurelien Barrau, Xiangyu Cao, Karim Noui, Alejandro Perez
(Submitted on 21 Apr 2015)
Using Monte Carlo simulations, we compute the integrated emission spectra of black holes in the framework of Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG). The black hole emission rates are governed by the entropy whose value, in recent holographic loop quantum gravity models, was shown to agree at leading order with the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. Quantum corrections depend on the Barbero-Immirzi parameter γ. Starting with black holes of initial horizon area A∼102 in Planck units, we present the spectra for different values of γ. Each spectrum clearly decomposes in two distinct parts: a continuous background which corresponds to the semi-classical stages of the evaporation and a series of discrete peaks which constitutes a signature of the deep quantum structure of the black hole. We show that γ has an effect on both parts that we analyze in details. Finally, we estimate the number of black holes and the instrumental resolution required to experimentally distinguish between the considered models.
11 pages, 9 figures
But I don't think their idea of holographic LQG models corresponds at level of details to the AdS/CFT picture you suggest in your example.
==excerpt from page 4==
As explained in the introduction, a fundamental understanding of the holographic hypothesis in the models leading to (15) might come from the recent results [24, 25, 33] that indicate a relationship between holography and LQG for complex Ashtekar variables (γ = ±i). ...
==endquote==
You might have a look at their references [24,25,32,33] just in case...
 
Last edited:
thanks. yes i was wondering

1 does a serious proposal of QG have to respect the holographic principle?
2 if lqg is a serious proposal does it respect the holographic principle?
3 if lqg does respect the holographic proposal, what does it look like?

if lqg in 4d was dual to some qft in 3 d
 
This is a naive question, I am probably completely missing what is meant by holographic principle, which may be unrelated to the intuitive content I ascribe to these words. But isn't there a kind of holographic principle in any theory of gravity ?

What I mean is, the information an observer has about a system comes from signals this system emits - and such signals must go through any surface enclosing the system : we have no more information about a system than we have about that surface.

If we accept that a system is physically defined by its potential for interacting with (being measured by) other systems, than its state or information content is exhausted by that of the enclosing surface.

(Please don't hurt me, I'm just a wabbit : ) )
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: marcus
I do not understand the idea of giving the holographic principle some fundamental importance.

Ok, if we consider a static homogeneous universe, a large enough homogeneous distribution of matter would have to collapse into a black hole. This could be very large, but its entropy would be that of a black hole, thus, proportional to its surface.

But if we look at the standard cosmological model of an expanding flat homogeneous universe, this effect does not matter. So, whatever the local density of entropy, it is proportional to the volume and not the surface of a region.

If the principle would have some fundamental importance, it could not be so easily circumvented by the expanding universe where we live.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K