Is There a Mistake in Calculating Vector Components and Angles?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on discrepancies in calculating vector components and angles, specifically regarding the x component of F1, which is claimed to be 3N by one party. There is confusion over the calculated angle, with one participant obtaining 9.16° while another reports 9.5°. The calculations seem to indicate that F1x is actually 7N, leading to further confusion about the correct angle. The participants express mutual understanding of the confusion, suggesting that minor differences in notation could be the cause. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities and potential errors in vector calculations.
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
There seems to be problem with the answer to this problem. Weirdly, they get that the x component of F1 is 3N!

Then, when they end up calculating the direction in C, they get 9.5°. I get 9.16°.

Am I the one going crazy? This is fairly straight-forward!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-05-22 at 11.08.21 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-05-22 at 11.08.21 AM.png
    16.1 KB · Views: 512
  • Screen Shot 2014-05-22 at 11.08.15 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-05-22 at 11.08.15 AM.png
    7.5 KB · Views: 493
Physics news on Phys.org
From the 31 "they"calculate, I conclude that F1x is 7N in their calculations. (I get 31.4)
You and I get 9.16 degrees, perhaps "they" write it as 9 degrees 5 minutes ? (I 9° and 6')

Wouldn't worry too much about this, you're no crazier than I am!
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Can A Vector Have Components Of Say Y or Z in the X-Hat Direction?
Replies
8
Views
858
Calculating Moment: Addition of Torque Components
Replies
3
Views
1K
Calculate electric force using Coulomb's law (vector components are the struggle)
Replies
3
Views
1K
Syntax Error? x and y components of E field in unit vector form
Replies
13
Views
2K
Understanding Velocity Addition Laws for People on Train & Ground
Replies
17
Views
2K
Am I Calculating the Components of V3 Correctly?
Replies
9
Views
2K
Writing a vector parallel and normal to a unit vector ##\hat n##
Replies
26
Views
1K
Vector Problem -- Addition of two vectors given in polar coordinates
Replies
11
Views
3K
Finding z component of a unit vector
Replies
2
Views
3K
Vector problem -- Find the angle between vector A and vector B
Replies
8
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top