Is There a One-to-One Barrier with Motors and Generators?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karae12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Barrier
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of a "one-to-one barrier" in motors and generators, questioning whether such a barrier exists. Participants clarify that no machine can produce more energy than it consumes, including transformers, which are subject to inefficiencies. The idea of "unity" is mentioned, suggesting a misunderstanding about the possibility of over-unity machines. There is speculation about the relationship between motors and generators, particularly regarding driving a generator with its own motor. Overall, the consensus is that the concept of a one-to-one barrier does not hold in practical applications.
karae12
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
a concept came up that that there is a one to one barrier with motors and generators. Is there such a thing? the only i am aware of would be relative to Newtons law (egual and oppisite reaction) if you put a number in is that the only number you have out? or can it be increase ( i thought that was what transformers do, produce more energy than you put in?

i am lost on this theory and would like to know if it does extist and if there is a law or person i can look up to help me.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I have no idea what you're talking about, but there is no such thing as a machine that produces more energy than is put into it, transformers included. :rolleyes:
 
Never heard of a "one to one barrier", let alone with regard to motors and generators.

Transformers certainly do NOT produce more energy than is put in. Like all other machines, they contain inefficiencies which reduce the energy output to less than the input.
 
I wonder if karae is referencing unity as being 1 to 1, and the impossibility of an over-unity machine.
It might be about trying to drive a generator with the motor that it's powering. :confused:
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top