Is There a Q Factor for DBRs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gen1111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relevance of the Q factor in evaluating distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs). While some argue that the Q factor, which measures energy loss in resonators, does not apply to DBRs, others suggest it can be meaningful in specific contexts, such as optical cavities formed by DBRs. The Q factor could be defined as the ratio of the central frequency to the bandwidth, indicating the sharpness of the resonance. This concept may be applicable to any function with a central peak, suggesting a broader utility beyond traditional oscillators. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for clarity on the definition of Q factor when discussing DBRs.
Gen1111
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Some people use Q factor as a measure of the quality of a distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) which doesn't make much sense to me.
I understand that the Q factor is a measure of how slw a resonator looses it's stored energy.
However, I don't think DBRs store energy in a similar way to springs or other oscillators.

I more or less understand what the Q factor of an optical cavity between two DBR means.
The cavity stores energy by confining light between the two DBRs, and if the Q factor is high the field intensity will take a long time to decay.
This is consistent to the definitions of Q factor.
Is there such thing as a Q factor of a DBR or is it just a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not an expert in DBRs, but I don't think you need to make an analogy to an oscillator to have a meaningful Q-factor.

Q factor could be the ratio of the central frequency over the difference between the half-power (-3dB) frequencies. It is a measure of sharpness.

But I suppose one could use this concept for any function with a central peak. Maybe you should ask to learn exactly what definition they are using.
 
Q factor is probably more useful as a measure of bandwidth because it's independent of frequency and doesn't need a % sign. In the case of a laser it's probably pretty high.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top