Is there a relationship between \Delta H_{sys} and \Delta S_{surroundings}?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the change in enthalpy (\Delta H_{sys}) and the change in entropy of the surroundings (\Delta S_{surroundings}) in the context of the second law of thermodynamics. It is established that a spontaneous process occurs when the total entropy change (\Delta S_{total}) is greater than zero, even if the system's entropy (\Delta S_{sys}) decreases. The Gibbs free energy equation (\Delta G = \Delta H - T\Delta S) is critical in understanding these relationships, particularly when \Delta H < 0 indicates that enthalpy is released to the surroundings, thus increasing their entropy. The discussion concludes that while \Delta S_{surroundings} can be calculated from \Delta H_{sys} under specific conditions, it is not directly proportional in all scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the second law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with Gibbs free energy equation (\Delta G = \Delta H - T\Delta S)
  • Knowledge of enthalpy (\Delta H) and entropy (\Delta S) concepts
  • Basic principles of thermodynamic systems and surroundings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the second law of thermodynamics in various chemical processes
  • Explore the Gibbs free energy and its applications in predicting spontaneity
  • Investigate the relationship between enthalpy and entropy in non-isolated systems
  • Learn about the calculation of \Delta S_{surroundings} in different thermodynamic scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in chemistry, particularly those studying thermodynamics, chemical engineers, and researchers analyzing spontaneous processes in chemical reactions.

erty
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
According to the 2nd law of thermodynamics, a spontaneous process will occur (or rather: is very likely to occur) if \Delta S &gt; 0.

A chemical process occurs if \Delta G &lt; 0, where G = H - TS.

Example:
H = -100 kJ
T = 1 K
S = -10 kJ/K
so \Delta G = - 190 kJ. In this example, \Delta G &lt; 0 but \Delta S &lt; 0.
Doesn't this contradict the 2nd law?
 
Science news on Phys.org
I don't see an S_{1} and an S_{2} so how did you compute \Delta S ?

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
I don't see an S_{1} and an S_{2} so how did you compute \Delta S ?

Daniel.

Okay, then
\Delta H = -100 \mbox{kJ}
T = 1 \mbox{K} and
\Delta S = -10 \mbox{kJ/K}
because \Delta G = \Delta H - T\Delta S where T is constant.
 
erty said:
Okay, then
\Delta H = -100 \mbox{kJ}
T = 1 \mbox{K} and
\Delta S = -10 \mbox{kJ/K}
because \Delta G = \Delta H - T\Delta S where T is constant.

If H changes, then that means that the system is not left to itself but is externally acted upon. So we are not dealing with a spontaneous process.
 
vanesch said:
If H changes, then that means that the system is not left to itself but is externally acted upon. So we are not dealing with a spontaneous process.

If \Delta H &lt; 0, then enthalpy is released from the system to the surroundings. It would make sense, if I had to add enthalpy (\Delta H &gt; 0, \qquad H = U + pV) and the entropy decreased, but that's not true according to the Gibbs energy.
 
Last edited:
If the system is isolated, a spontaneous process will increase its entropy. The Universe is an isolated system in itself, so entropy is always increasing.
But if there is a variation in entalpy (a decrease) at constant temperature T, for sure your system is not isolated. The environment is absorbing such energy, increasing its entropy in a greater extent than the entropy lost by the system (the variation, in absolute value, of the entalpy is grater than that of the entropy, as variation og G is negative). So the universe, the system and the environment, experiments an increase in entropy. This is the result of the second law. No contradiction at all.
 
erty said:
If \Delta H &lt; 0, then enthalpy is released from the system to the surroundings. It would make sense, if I had to add enthalpy (\Delta H &gt; 0, \qquad H = U + pV) and the entropy decreased, but that's not true according to the Gibbs energy.

No of course not. Take water. You extract enthalpy (you cool it). It freezes, and its entropy decreases...
 
vivesdn said:
If the system is isolated, a spontaneous process will increase its entropy. The Universe is an isolated system in itself, so entropy is always increasing.
But if there is a variation in entalpy (a decrease) at constant temperature T, for sure your system is not isolated. The environment is absorbing such energy, increasing its entropy in a greater extent than the entropy lost by the system (the variation, in absolute value, of the entalpy is grater than that of the entropy, as variation og G is negative). So the universe, the system and the environment, experiments an increase in entropy. This is the result of the second law. No contradiction at all.

I get it, thanks! \Delta S_{total} &gt; 0, even though \Delta S_{sys} &lt; 0, because \Delta H_{sys} &lt; 0 according to the Gibbs energy and the conditions for a spontaneous process.

Is it possible to calculate the \Delta S_{surroundings}, if I know the \Delta H_{sys}? I mean, is there any proportionality between those two variables?
 
vanesch said:
No of course not. Take water. You extract enthalpy (you cool it). It freezes, and its entropy decreases...

Yes, but the \Delta S_{total} &gt; 0, because the surroundings get warmer.
(Or did I get this wrong?)
 
Last edited:
  • #10
erty said:
Is it possible to calculate the \Delta S_{surroundings}, if I know the \Delta H_{sys}? I mean, is there any proportionality between those two variables?

If my memory is still readable, I would say that \Delta S_{surroundings} is equal to \Delta H_{sys} if volume is constant (more generally, if there is no work performed of PV type). Then \Delta H_{sys} is the thermal energy transferred.
If there is work performed, then enthalpy is not equal to Q, the heat.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K