Is there a specific unit used to measure redshift?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Redshift in cosmology is quantified using the dimensionless parameter 'z', which is calculated as the ratio of observed wavelength to emitted wavelength. For example, if an observed wavelength is 1,000 nm and the emitted wavelength is 500 nm, then z equals 2. This unit-less measurement is essential for understanding the distance of distant galaxies, especially with upcoming projects like the James Webb Space Telescope and the Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT). The calculation of distance based on redshift is complex due to the expanding universe, and online calculators such as the one provided by UCLA can assist in these calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological redshift and its significance
  • Familiarity with wavelength measurements in nanometers (nm)
  • Basic knowledge of the expanding universe model
  • Experience with online cosmological calculators
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the formula for calculating redshift: 1 + z = λo/λe
  • Explore the functionality of the UCLA CosmoCalc for distance calculations
  • Study the implications of redshift in the context of the James Webb Space Telescope
  • Investigate the role of redshift in the E-ELT project and its astronomical applications
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students studying cosmology who are interested in measuring distances to distant galaxies and understanding the implications of redshift in modern astronomy.

ASmartDude
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
i have been learning about using redshift to measure the distance of far-flung objects, but in all my research i never saw a specific unit used to quantify how redshifted an object is. to me it seems like an oversight, because such a unit would be very useful for the study of distant galaxies, and which the impending launch of the james webb telescope and the E-ELT project underway (i think), it seems to me such a unit would be needed for these tools to be properly used. so has anybody bothered to quantify redshift, or am i the first person to think of this?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Redshift in cosmology is usually labeled as 'z'. It is unit-less because you divide the units out when you compare the observed wavelength to the known source wavelength. So if we observe a wavelength of 1,000 nm from a source that we know must have emitted 500 nm light, then ##z=\frac{1000 nm}{500 nm}=2##.
 
Redshift is based on a ratio between wavelengths. As such it is dimensionless and does not need a unit.

Drakkith said:
Redshift in cosmology is usually labeled as 'z'. It is unit-less because you divide the units out when you compare the observed wavelength to the known source wavelength. So if we observe a wavelength of 1,000 nm from a source that we know must have emitted 500 nm light, then ##z=\frac{1000 nm}{500 nm}=2##.

The definition is ##1 + z = \lambda_o/\lambda_e##. For your example, the redshift would be ##z = 1## and ##z = 0## corresponds to no redshift at all.
 
Drakkith said:
Redshift in cosmology is usually labeled as 'z'. It is unit-less because you divide the units out when you compare the observed wavelength to the known source wavelength. So if we observe a wavelength of 1,000 nm from a source that we know must have emitted 500 nm light, then ##z=\frac{1000 nm}{500 nm}=2##.
that makes sense. i thought i was onto a big discovery, but i guess not. thanks for the help!
 
ASmartDude said:
that makes sense. i thought i was onto a big discovery, but i guess not. thanks for the help!
The distance, by the way, is calculated based upon a model of how the universe has expanded over time. There are some online calculators that will do this, such as this one:
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html

It's unfortunately complicated, because distances are pretty complicated in an expanding universe.
 
Orodruin said:
The definition is ##1 + z = \lambda_o/\lambda_e##. For your example, the redshift would be ##z = 1## and ##z = 0## corresponds to no redshift at all.

Ah, my mistake. Thanks, Oro.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K