Is There a User-Friendly Program for Creating Truth Trees?

blalien
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I'm looking for a simple program that will create truth trees for me. You see graphics like this (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/ad/Partially_built_tableau.svg/200px-Partially_built_tableau.svg.png) all the time, but I can't believe anybody would be fiddling around on MS Paint or one of those excessively complicated flow chart programs. Any recommendations? Free is always good.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see that it's too complicated to make such graphs with basic vector graphics editor like http://www.inkscape.org/" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dot

Try dot/GraphViz.
 
Image looks like it was made in microsoft visio to me
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top