Is There a Y-Component of Velocity in Fully Developed Pipe Flow?

AI Thread Summary
In fully developed, steady, incompressible flow within a horizontal pipe, the velocity profile is parabolic, indicating a primary x-component (u) of velocity. The discussion centers on whether a y-component (v) exists, with initial intuition suggesting it does not. However, the continuity equation indicates that if u is constant (as in fully developed flow), then v must also be zero, meaning there is no y-component of velocity. The flow is laminar, and particles move horizontally without a y-component, despite the need for v to satisfy the continuity equation. Ultimately, the understanding is that while viscosity creates velocity gradients, the flow remains predominantly horizontal.
billybob70
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Let's say we have a horizontal pipe with steady, incompressible, two dimensional flow. There is friction at the top and bottom of the pipe which causes viscous effects.
The flow is fully developed. The velocity profile is parabolic.

Obviously there is an x-component (u) of velocity.

Is there also a y-component of velocity (v), in this fully developed region?

My intuition says no, but from reading my book it implies that there is, although it is not very well explained.

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If there was a 'y' component, where would it go?

EDIT: To expand on that...

Draw a control volume inside the pipe. You have no velocity crossing the boundary on either the top or the bottom. If you have any sort of 'y' velocity inside the volume, it will cause a curl in the flow field, and you've already stated that the flow is fully developed.

Which book are you using, and how does it imply that there is?
 
Last edited:
Apart of the integral explanation of enigma...

Take continuity equation:

\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}=0

If the flow is fully developed: \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}=0

Therefore \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}=0

and integrating it from 0 to y:

v(y)=v(0). Taking into account there is no suction-inflow through walls v(y)=v(0)=0

As an advice, try to work out a steady solution when there is flow suction through walls v(0) \neq 0 and see what happens. It is very easy.
 
thanks for your replies.

i understand the part of the continuity equation that says
change in u / change in x =0 when fully developed. This makes sense because the velocity is now constant.
And i understand why u is slowing down initially (because of friction).
So according to the continuity equation, if u is slowing down, v has to be speeding up. and since v initially reaches zero, it must be a negative number to start with. correct?

the part i don't understand is that its supposed to be LAMINAR flow. so if i took any particle in the stream and followed it through the pipe, it would always be running horizontally (and not have any v component).
So i understand why there is a v-component to satisfy the continuity equation, but not if i try to picture what is going on in the pipe.
 
The continuity equation is actually

What is going on in the pipe is that the wall slows the fluid down and the fluid near the center needs to speed up to "make up" for the tardines of the fluid near the wall. Note that viscosity and a velocity gradients also generates vorticity. however the assumtion is that the fuid elements translate horizontally while rotating, just like a bunch of ball bearings on top of each other
 
Thanks guys (or gals), i understand it now.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
Back
Top