Is there always a potential for conservative motion?

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



It is well known that for a conservative motion there is a potential.
This potential is a function of coordinates only.

Prove this.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I think you have to take a definition of conservative motion then for example prove that for such a motion, the rotational forces equals to 0 and they don't depend on time, then it will mean that there is a potential field.


What is the equation for conservative motion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I guess we suppose that the general form of the force field is F=F(q,p,t)
 


In general, a force is conservative iff the path integral of F around some closed path is equal to 0. This is equivalent to stating that the curl of F = 0.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top