Is There an Error in My Equilibrium Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nuomi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculations
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating equilibrium concentrations for the reaction SO2(g) + NO2(g) ⇌ NO(g) + SO3(g) with a given equilibrium constant Kc = 85.0 at 460°C. Initial volumes of reactants and products are converted to molar concentrations based on STP conditions. The user constructs an ICE table and derives a quadratic equation to solve for x, but their calculated equilibrium concentrations do not satisfy the 5% rule, indicating potential errors in their calculations. Other participants suggest checking the math and clarify that the 5% rule is a guideline for validity in approximations. The user expresses uncertainty about their algebra and the application of the 5% rule, seeking further clarification.
nuomi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1.The equilibrium constant is Kc = 85.0 at 460°C for the reaction
SO2(g) + NO2(g)\UpdownarrowNO(g) + SO3(g)
If 2.24L SO2, 4.48 L NO2, 2.24 L NO and 3.36 L SO3 (ALL AT STP) are transferred to a 5.00 L reaction vessel and heated to 460°C, what will be the equilibrium molar concentrations?

2. because it is at STP it's safe to assume that 1 mole will equal 22.4 L, therefore I could divide all the initial volumes by 22.4L to get mol then divide by 5.00L to get mol L-1.
3. I made an initial, change, equilibrium chart.
SO2 NO2 NO SO3
I: .02, .04, .02, .03
C: -x, -x, +x, +X
E: .02-x, .04-X, .02+x, .03+x

Kc= CNOCSO3/CSO2CNO2
85= (.02+x) (.03+x)/(.02-x)(.04-X) -> 85= .0006+.05X+x2/.0008-.06x-x2 -> 85(.0008-.06x-x2)=.0006+.05X+x2-> .068-5.1x-85x2=.0006+.05X+x2-> 84x2-5.15x+.00674=0
-(-5.15) +-\sqrt{(-5.15)^2-4(84*.0674)} divided by 2(84)
x=.0424, x=.0189

now when equated back into the calculations for equilib. concentrations
E: .0011, .0211,.0389,.0489
those numbers can't be correct because in order to be a valid assumption doesn't the number i got for x/by the initial given*100 have to be less than 5%...mine are not therefore there must be something mistaken in my calculations. can someone please explain this to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nuomi said:
85= (.02+x) (.03+x)/(.02-x)(.04-X) -> 85= .0006+.05X+x2/.0008-.06x-x2 -> 85(.0008-.06x-x2)=.0006+.05X+x2-> .068-5.1x-85x2=.0006+.05X+x2-> 84x2-5.15x+.00674=0

Check your math.

those numbers can't be correct because in order to be a valid assumption doesn't the number i got for x/by the initial given*100 have to be less than 5%...

Where have you used assumptions that work if 5% rule is obeyed?
 
this is the other eq. that i got

-86x2-5.15x+.0674

-(-5.15) +- \sqrt{(-5.15)^2*4(-86*.0674)} divided by 2(-86)


is there a rule of mathematics that i might not be following...i am a little rusty on algebra etc.
the 5% rule was out of my textbook but it doesn't seem to work on any of my other problems so i think there is something I'm not factoring into it.
 
85= (.02+x) (.03+x)/(.02-x)(.04-X) is OK, you make some error later.

State 5% rule.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top